Kids knocked over my bike, can I sue the parents?

Kids knocked over my bike, can I sue the parents?

I parked my bike at a designated bike parking spot near a small shopping centre.

When I came back, it was on its side. I knew that there was CCTV around, so I called the police. The police got the security guy to show the footage, and it turned out that my motorbike was knocked over by two kids on BMX bikes who looked about ten.

They were trying to swap over bikes while they were riding, and it all went wrong. Both bikes and the two lads clattered into my motorbike, leaving some bike-shaped damage on one side and crush damage on the other.

The police told me that they had managed to find the two lads – they did not have to look very far, as they were at a BMX/skatepark less than 400 meters away. They admitted that it was them who knocked the bike over.

So far, so easy, you would have thought, I asked the police for the details of the lads but they said that they would not give them to me because the boys were aged under ten years old and could not be prosecuted. They also gave me the usual spiel about data protection and court rules around identifying children and young persons.

I am not interested in prosecuting: I want their parents to pay for the damage to the bike, which Is over £400. I think I have got a proper right to ask for details of the parents, for letting their boys out and about on bikes when they clearly were going to ride like a pair of idiots.

Is there any way that I can get through this police indifference, and actually find out who the parents of the boys actually are?


It is possible but I would really would not bother If I were you. It is not negligent for parents to allow nine-year-old boys to cycle in a largely pedestrianised area, or to a local skate/BMX park to play on their bikes.

In order for you to bring a claim against the parents, you would have to show that they were negligent; that is, in law they fell below the standards expected of an ordinarily prudent parent.

The courts are extraordinarily slow to impose a duty on parents to control their children. There are cases going back over 90 years where people have tried to sue parents for the wrongs of their children, on the basis that the parent should have taken greater care. These have always had very little success.

If this were an extreme example, say the parents had put a ten-year-old kid on an unrestricted motocross bike and told him to go out and play on it, that obviously falls far below the standards of any reasonably prudent parent, and they would be liable.

That is a completely different order to letting boys aged, it seems, under ten play on their BMX bikes. Even If you were to get the parents’ details, you would have no luck in suing them, and it is close to impossible to sue a child. Not least because children rarely have any assets.

I am not going to pretend to have any expertise in the obligations the police have to furnish you with the details of the boys. However, I have spoken to an ex-copper – now a solicitor – who tells me that the police have no obligation to advise you of the details of a perpetrator. And whilst there is a cumbersome civil legal procedure you could use which may get the details you want. It would cost you much, much more than £400.

There is scope in law to obtain the details of a wrong-doer from an innocent party who holds the identity of the wrongdoer but the usual rule is you pay their legal costs as well as your own if you need to find out that information.

Under the age of ten, they have no criminal capacity – or doli incapax If you prefer the Latin. Unfortunately, I think you are Just going to have to suck this one up.

Andrew Dalton

RiDE Magazine May 2020

Stay up-to-date

White Dalton Email Newsletter
Subscribe to our weekly email newsletter to keep up-to-date or follow us on Facebook or Twitter

Posted by Andrew Dalton. Last modified: March 19, 2021 at 3:49 pm

Andrew Dalton is a highly experienced trial lawyer who delights in taking on difficult and demanding motorcycle cases. He has a tough and relentless litigation style and is utterly focused on getting the best possible outcomes for his clients.
Disclaimer: The legal advice and statements contained within this/these articles is correct at the time of printing. If you are seeking legal advice after a motorbike accident please contact us to speak directly with one of our lawyers.
Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Richard Taylor
Richard Taylor
1 month ago

Surely this is what insurance is for? Claim on your policy and let the insurers chase the perpetrators if they wish? Noting the bike was parked in a proper bay, not in a kids playground!

Andrew Dalton
Andrew Dalton
Reply to  Richard Taylor
1 month ago

That is indeed true Richard, but this chap was London based and relatively young. A claim on his insurance gets very expensive and if he has a second one, he gets close to uninsurable. I have a feeling this gentleman opted for self repairs in the end because I could not help him. Ebay fairing was the least painful of his limited range of options. I had a similar incident (well not quite, but 2 children sprinted out into the road in front of me on a bitterly cold day with their hoods pulled up). I stacked my 1993 CBR 600 which was less than a year old, watched it hit the kerb and flip up and damage the other side of the fairing and even as a very green horn young lawyer I knew I would be sucking that one up. The kids were entirely unhurt, I had bumps and bruises and a realisation that even in 1993 Honda plastics were made out of a carbon fibre, gold and diamond compound, at least judging by the price and there was no Ebay back then or the internet to source parts.

About RiDE Magazine

RiDE Magazine Magazine Cover Image

Ask the lawyer

Gavin Grewal, used to volunteer his time as a special constable which gave him a good insight into how evidence is gathered from accident scenes. Gavin is partner at specialist motorcycle solicitors White Dalton.

Visit the RiDE Magazine website

More RiDE Magazine Posts: