All our highly trained Solicitors and Barristers ride motorcycles. We provide professional legal advice, finely tuned with biking expertise - We Ride, We Know

Who is to blame?

In collisions car drivers are generally at fault with the main cause of the accident being simply that the motorcyclist was not seen

Less specialist solicitors will often advise to accept greater responsibility than they should or even that there is no case at all

Scenarios?

We are expert in arguments over responsibility, including difficult areas of speed, filtering and road surface defects

we regularly take over serious claims only to find the previous solicitors have seriously undervalued items of loss

Why use us

We will act on a no win, no fee basis, even if your case has been rejected by other solicitors

all White Dalton lawyers are motorcyclists, so they know the risks faced by motorcyclists on the road

Slip Off And Rip-Off

I bought a standard Honda CBF1000 GT from my local dealers in September 2008.I bought the GT version because I wanted the extra bodywork, screen and panniers.

I insured the bike with one of the leading bike insurers at a value of £7,000, which is exactly what I paid for it, and put on the proposal form that it was a CBF1000 GT.

A few months later, I slipped off my bike, probably as a result of ice forming on manhole covers. That hurt, but what really annoyed me was when I put in the claim.

The claims adjusters told me that because my bike was non-standard, they would only pay out on a standard bike, at about £1,650 less.

When I pointed out to my insurers a virtually brand new bike was being massively undercompensated, they helpfully told me that I, "Should have declared the extras on my proposal form". I know I've been ripped off, but can I do anything about it?

Philip Tait, Cheshire

Yes, you can. The key document is your proposal form. A contract of insurance is a contract of utmost good faith, where any declarations you make can entirely void the policy if they are inaccurate.

Nearly all contracts of insurance have the following within the first clauses: "Every question we ask you is a material question. If you answer the question incorrectly or wrongly whether deliberately, or by accident even through no fault of your own, we can void the policy".

So any non-declaration can void the policy, which means it's treated as though it never existed. It won't affect any third party rights against you, like if your bike is involved in an accident where somebody else gets hurt, but it can give the insurance company the right to come after you for money.

These problems tend to come up on theft claims or accident damage claims, where the insurers and their loss adjusters have access to your bike, so they can see that it's had fitments put on which you haven't declared. They don't have to pay for them if you haven't declared them.

But in this case, you had declared them by stating your bike was a CBF1000 GT, and Honda confirmed that your bike was standard. I'm glad you stuck at this as long as you did. Your insurers eventually did what they should have done from day one; pay you out on the bike you had properly declared on your insurance proposal. A lot of people would have given up £1,650.

As a general word of warning, keep a photocopy of your insurance proposal and don't let any error creep in. The most common query I get from readers relates to insurers refusing to pay out on theft or damage claims, relying on material non-disclosure. Cover yourself by making sure that every point you put down on your proposal is totally correct and keep a copy.

Andrew Dalton

We'll Call You...

Request a callback from one of our team

Andrew Dalton

Paul Henry

John Lloyd-Richards

Rhiannon Davies

Andrew Prendergast

Jo Readman

Clare Franklin

  • Solicitor
  • Rides: Kawasaki 600 Eliminator
  • Full Profile
  • Likes: Rallying

Martyn Dey


Don't be someone else's learning curve. Call our 24 hour help hotline on 0800 783 6191 for clear, expert legal help